Here we go again, penny lovers

May 9th, 2009 Here and There Posted in currency, pet peeves, serious 1 Comment »

pennyOh, awesome. Did ya hear? The United States Postal Service will be raising the cost of first-class stamps starting Monday. The current cost? $0.42. The increase? Let me give you a magnifying glass: $0.02.

For a whopping grand total of $ANNOYING.

What is it with the U.S. Mint and the USPS keeping pennies on life support? Where’s the incentive in charging for them, not to mention doling them out in the form of change from stamp machines?

Memo to the Secretary of the Treasury and the Post Master General: This hard-working, tax-paying, minimal mail customer would gladly pay a healthily rounded $0.50 for a stamp. Hell, I use the mail so little, I’d be cool shelling out a dollar.

Yes, I would pay cash money to no longer have pennies in my life.

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

We shouldn’t fill out forms by hand anymore

May 7th, 2009 Here and There Posted in office, pet peeves, random observations, serious No Comments »

(Alternate post title: How HR screwed up my dental insurance)

Perhaps this post belongs on White Whine. I had a dentist appointment scheduled for the end of the month, and hadn’t yet received my new dental insurance information. My benefits kicked in May 1, you see. I had received medical and vision cards. Just no dental.

But as the appointment wasn’t until May 31, I figured I had plenty of time for the card to arrive at my house.

I asked a coworker yesterday whether she had got hers yet. She had. Something seemed fishy.

I spoke with HR today, and the rep read my address back to me, off by one digit. Awesome.

But this all reminded me: Why are we still filling out forms by hand? There are so many reasons why we shouldn’t be doing this, namely:

  1. It increases the chances of error (see: this post)
  2. It wastes paper
  3. It wastes time
  4. It creates at least twice as much effort as is necessary

If you’re an office, and you ask people to fill out a form that you will then enter into a computer, do us all a favor, please: Stop. Just set a computer terminal out where people can access it, and let us fill our own damn information in.

Okay, carry on …

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Hey, AT&T: Hire More People to Answer the Phone

August 14th, 2008 Here and There Posted in ipod touch/iphone, pet peeves, serious, technology, travel No Comments »

I’ve been on hold for about an hour now. I have to end the call to hop in the shower and make it to work on time. All I want is details on using my iPhone in Europe. Perhaps I’m better off searching online.

The automated message told me at the outset that they were experiencing unusually long wait times. But an hour? And still no answer? They could’ve at least had the courtesy, as some automated services do, to tell me how long the wait was.

Oh well, at least I have speaker phone, and could get on with my life. You know, answering email, surfing news, blogging.

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Idle Cars Are the Devil’s Playthings

July 10th, 2008 Here and There Posted in environment, pet peeves, random observations, serious, transportation No Comments »

Can anyone out there point me to studies done to determine how much gas is wasted and pollution emitted, in aggregate, from all the cars out there that needlessly idle?

Another concern I have is poorly designed traffic lights that lead to an abundance of cars stopping at many intervals of what should’ve been a simple drive. I see this in Texas a lot, with the green light on the street with no traffic for minutes on end, while the cars that are stopped by the red keep lining up.

But I see it here in San Francisco, too. On downtown’s one-way streets, especially.

This morning, I rode my bike to work a little earlier than normal, and noticed that the cars I was riding with were forced by red lights to stop at 11th, 10th, Ninth, Eighth, Seventh, and Sixth streets, before being granted a green light at Fifth. Seems very wasteful, in terms of energy and time, and all those unnecessary stops have got to be spewing an ungodly amount of emissions into the atmosphere.

Multiply all the stops at all the intersections of any given city by all the other towns across the country, and seems we’ve got a very fixable problem on our hands.

But I need data to back me up here. Anyone?

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

How to Stop Phone-Book Delivery

June 18th, 2008 Here and There Posted in environment, pet peeves, serious No Comments »

The bane of my existence.

Thx: Alexis

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

SFPD: Geniuses at Misallocated Resources

March 17th, 2008 Here and There Posted in city, pet peeves, serious No Comments »

Ugh, don’t get me started on the SFfuckingPD. Last night, we decided pretty late in the evening to head over to Berkeley to stay at Tara’s place. I-80 was a construction nightmare. I won’t go into the astoundingly inept detour signage, but I do want to comment on what we both remarked at the time was an utterly ridiculous situation.

At various points in the off-the-highway route through SOMA, we noticed a surplus of SFPD police officers. At first, I was astounded that they’d be used at all, but then I remembered it’s probably a matter of jurisdiction (as in, at a certain point at the base of the offramp or somewhere, CalTrans’s authority ends and the local police’s begins). Fine, but why so many officers? The vast majority of them were literally standing there talking to one another. This was around 11:30 p.m., and we talked about how they could’ve been out patrolling, for example, the Mission, where surely there were muggings, shootings, possibly rapes and murders going down right in the streets.

Lo and behold, we got to Berkeley and found this story about a shooting in the Mission that killed one person and injured three. It happened sometime before 11:07, which is when the story was published.

Now, I realize the police can’t be everywhere all the time, but the fact is that a strong police presence deters crime. I never realized it more until I visited Buenos Aires last year. It was comforting to see so many uniformed officers out in the streets. I even asked one for directions at one point.

What was the force thinking having so many uniformed officers in SOMA last night, or any night for that matter? Who’s running things down there? Ugh.

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Guest Post: Muni

February 21st, 2008 tara Posted in city, internet/multimedia, pet peeves, public transportation, serious, technology No Comments »

My name is Tara, and I’ll be your guest blogger this afternoon. I beat out hordes of competitors for this gig by being almost as eloquent, yet about as indignant, as Here and There, of which I’ve been a fan for a while, now. Cheers, HaT, and thanks for the soapbox.

We are gathered here today thanks to this story on SF Gate. This time, SF City Hall is patting itself on the back over the so-called “Connected Bus” in its Muni arsenal. A vehicle that, once you finally board it 15 minutes late, allows you to connect to the internet and download music, porn, or whatever your pleasure is as you commute home. There is so much wrong with this idea, and here’s why.

1. $10,000-shmousand
This SuperBus apparently costs in the neighborhood of $10,000. I don’t care if it cost $10. Don’t hold news conferences to show off your urban transportation prowess if you can’t devote significant funding and time to fixing Muni’s problems, the most basic and largest one of them being on-time performance.

2. All that said, Muni is broke. According to this Feb. 15 SF Gate story:

“The San Francisco Municipal Railway has a ridership of nearly 700,000 a day, but has been unable to deliver the level of service that city voters demanded in 1999 when they required 85 percent on-time performance – a milestone that’s never been achieved. To make significant improvements, agency officials say they need between $100 million and $150 million more a year. That’s in addition to the agency’s annual operating budget of $687 million.”

If that means raising the cost of a monthly FastPass to $60 — something I am willing to pay, since governments run on taxes and fees, after all — so be it. However, even that increase would be a drop in the bucket, amounting to roughly $18 million per year. Raising the single-ride fare to $2 from $1.50 would bring in another $13 million to $14.8 million per year. They could maybe go for a voter-approved bond or tax increase if that option gains enough support. Or, maybe they could divert funding away from fancy-sounding staff positions in City Hall in order to aid the transportation system — something residents, tourists- and bridge-and-tunnelers alike use in some capacity every single day.

3. I’ve never seen anyone with a laptop on a Muni, unless it was the underground light-rail that goes right through downtown. Even rich urban people tend not to ride the bus, since, from a socio-economic standpoint, it’s still more of a lower-class thing to do in a city. These people, the ones with laptops and PDAs, won’t start doing riding the bus unless they’re on time, more frequent and become more comfortable.

Socio-economics aside, given the slippery seats, the constant vigilance in an attempt to stay unstabbed or unrobbed and the sometime raucous atmosphere, this is a horrible place to get any work or internetting done. Maybe, I don’t know, devoting money first to upgrading these mobile blight carriages would encourage more people, rich and poor, to ride them, cut down on unruly passengers, and make the drivers less pissed-off.

4. Luddite?
Before you tell me to untwist my granny panties, let me just say: I love the internet. I get anxious if I’m disconnected at home or at work, I actually do have a laptop (two, actually, if you count my work machine), and I’m upset that citywide wifi, and the resulting plethora of free access to information and services, isn’t more of a priority. Muni and access to wifi are both problems that need to be addressed, but smashing the two together and calling it progress sounds analogous to polishing a turd.

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

When things don’t work

December 12th, 2007 Here and There Posted in currency, personal, pet peeves, slightly ridiculous No Comments »

Yet another dollar got stuck in the soda machine here at work today. Someone now owes me either $3 or $4. I think I’ll be charging interest for the pain and distress involved.

To top it all off, I took my bills downstairs to Walgreens, where I was charged $1.02. Besides the outrageous pricing for a can of cola, the cashier wouldn’t give me the $0.02. Argh! Don’t get me started on pennies.

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The reason (why)

November 5th, 2007 Here and There Posted in grammar, words + copy, pet peeves 1 Comment »

Just a quick quip (read: gripe) about a common construction in both written and spoken English: When people include “why” following “the reason.”

It’s just not necessary. And I’d honestly enjoy being pointed to a contradictory example.

“The reason why the sun rises in the east …”

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

General question about cellphones

July 28th, 2007 Here and There Posted in pet peeves, serious, technology 8 Comments »

Does anyone know of a phone out there whose screen stays on the entire time a call is in progress? Seems absurd, I realize. Annoying as fuck, also. But no phone I’ve ever had performs this simple function, which of course would allow the user to a) tell time, b) browse text messages, c) access contact info, all while also taking a call.

I’ve asked many friends and coworkers, and no one seems to have a phone that does this. Do you know of one?

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

… on your way out

June 13th, 2007 Here and There Posted in pet peeves, serious 4 Comments »

There are only two types of people in this world:

* those who turn door knobs
* those who do not turn door knobs

Can you guess which I am, and which is a pet peeve?

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Grown men wearing hoods

March 20th, 2007 Here and There Posted in city, pet peeves, slightly ridiculous No Comments »

Okay, enough. I’ve had enough. Enough of these Mission hipsters walking around with their hoods on. Why? Stop that!

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

My least favorite topics

March 12th, 2007 Here and There Posted in pet peeves, serious, slightly ridiculous 1 Comment »

What are your least favorite things to talk about?

Mine are, in no specific order, the following:

Music (specifically when people make you answer the worst question in the world, “What kind of music do you listen to?”)
Diet (when people basically use conversation to advertise what and how they eat. Diet is personal. Keep it to yourself, please)
College (as in, “What school did you go to?” Does anyone really care?)
Tattoos (sorry, they don’t mean anything)
Sports (yeah, I’m just so not interested)
Dreams (not always. When your dreams involve my doing entertaining things, I’m all ears. Otherwise, I’m bored and probably just nodding my head. Also, I’d guess that only one in 25 or so are compelling.)
Astrology (does this need a qualifier? As a former industry insider … well, never mind.)
Babies (I’m no baby hater. Just find them boring, usually. Or at least, talk about them.)

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Tired of hearing it (about trial lawyers)

December 14th, 2006 Here and There Posted in law, pet peeves, politics, serious No Comments »

Why is it when you mention John Edwards, many people’s first reaction is something along the lines of, “Yeah, he’s okay, but I don’t like trial lawyers.”???

Where do people get off dismissing an entire profession, especially one with as much diversity as the generic term “trial lawyer” implies?

Rather than enumerate Edwards’s notable achievements as a “trial lawyer,” I recommend you read this.

Okay, fine, if you don’t believe people and corporations in power, first, have a responsibility to ensure the safety of their goods and services, and second, should be held legally liable in cases wherein those goods and services cause permanent harm, and if you enjoy generalizing across a broad spectrum of society, then I’ll allow you this slight.

Otherwise, think about such blanket statements before you say them.

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Trivializing gender and race

November 18th, 2006 Here and There Posted in pet peeves, serious No Comments »

Let me say LOUDLY, once and for all:

1) I do not care that Nancy Pelosi is the first female Speaker of the House. I do care that there was a transfer of power in Congress, and that the general gist of the ideas behind that transfer may put an end to the dangerous ideas and actions of the Bush Administration.

2) I do not care that Hillary Clinton could become the first female major party candidate for president in 2008. Regardless of the triviality behind that notion, Hillary Clinton pretty much sucks.

3) I do not care that Barack Obama could become the first African-American major party candidate for president in 2008. Regardless of the triviality behind that notion, Obama would be a great president, black, white, brown, yellow, purple, male, female.

Sorry if I sound bitter. I’m just a little tired of being patronized with questions like, “Isn’t it about time we had a (black, female) (president, speaker of the House)?” Such an idiotic question doesn’t even merit a response. And speaking of merits, what happened to judging public officials based on their ideas and actions, not something inherent and ultimately of little or no consequence, like race and/or gender?

I’m annoyed.

Share this post
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • MySpace
AddThis Social Bookmark Button